The petitioner sought permission to withdraw a writ petition. The Court granted permission to withdraw with liberty for a witness to appear via video conferencing before the Trial Court as previously directed. The petition was disposed of accordingly.
Permission granted to withdraw petition with liberty for witness to appear via VC.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~31
NARESH KUMAR ARORA ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. J. C. Mahindro and Mr. Shubham Agarwal, Advs.
STATE & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Raghvendra Upadhayay and Mr. Aasim Ali, Advs. for R-1. Ms. Chenny Singh, Adv. for R-2 to R-5.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SHALINDER KAUR
O R D E R % 14.05.2024
SHALINDER KAUR, J.
MAY 14, 2024 /ss
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 02/07/2025 at 03:01:29
NARESH KUMAR ARORA
STATE & ORS.
SHALINDER KAUR
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 227 of the Constitution invoking the High Court's supervisory jurisdiction over subordinate civil courts.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
