M/S Satyam Developers v. Rahul Dubey & Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
Consumer petition before the High Court had become infructuous as the NCDRC disposed of the main petition; the petitioner sought and was granted permission to withdraw.
Consumer petition before the High Court had become infructuous as the NCDRC disposed of the main petition; the petitioner sought and was granted permission to withdraw.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~23
Through: Mr. Ghanshyam Joshi and Mr. Chirag Joshi, Advs.
versus
RAHUL DUBEY & ANR. ..... Respondents
Through: Mr. Rajat Kapoor and Mr. Piyush Tomar, Advs. for R-1.
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SHALINDER KAUR
O R D E R % 14.05.2024
SHALINDER KAUR, J.
MAY 14, 2024 SDS
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 02/07/2025 at 03:03:09
M/S Satyam Developers
Rahul Dubey
Anr.
Shalinder Kaur
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 227 of the Constitution invoking the High Court's supervisory jurisdiction over subordinate civil courts.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court