Vimlendu Kumar Jha v. Minal Bhatnagar
Case brief
What is this about?
The Delhi High Court disposed of an application under Section 151 CPC filed by the respondent for modification of a domestic violence protection order. The court noted the pending maintenance application under Section 26 of the DV Act by the petitioner before the Family Court.
What did the court decide?
Main application allowed subject to exceptions; modification application disposed of.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~85
- IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
- CM(M) 2557/2024
VIMLENDU KUMAR JHA ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Ashish Prasad, Mr. Atri Roy Chowdhary and Mr. Vishal Kappor, Advs.
- versus
MINAL BHATNAGAR ..... Respondent Through: Advocate. (appearance not given)
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SHALINDER KAUR
O R D E R
% 28.05.2024
CM APPL. 32652/2024—Exp.
- Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether to modify an interim order on domestic violence protection
Whether to dispose of an application praying for modification of order
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Vimlendu Kumar Jha
- respondent
Minal Bhatnagar
Coram
Shalinder Kaur
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court