This single-judge order allowed a petitioner to participate in ongoing suit proceedings regarding rent and possession. The court directed a written statement to be filed within two weeks and imposed a cost of Rs. 25,000 for the delay caused.
Petitioner permitted to participate; directed to file written statement within two weeks and pay Rs. 25,000 cost.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~35
.....Petitioner Through: Mr. Jitin Tewathia, Advocate.
versus
RAMESH CHANDER GUPTA
.....Respondent Through: Mr. Rohit Pradhan, Advocate.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAIN J U D G M E N T (oral)
CM(M) 2427/2024 & CM APPL. 44484/2024
Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:SONIA THAPLIYAL Signing Da te:1 7.08.2024 17:05:35
CM(M) 2427/2024 1
(MANOJ JAIN) JUDGE
AUGUST 16, 2024/ sw
CM(M) 2427/2024 2
Signature Not Verified
Digitally Signed By:SONIA THAPLIYAL Signing Da te:1 7.08.2024 17:05:35
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to permit the petitioner to participate in the suit proceedings ex parte despite previous dismissal of stay applications.
Jan Mohammad
Ramesh Chander Gupta
Manoj Jain
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 227 of the Constitution invoking the High Court's supervisory jurisdiction over subordinate civil courts.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
