The petitioner, through counsel, stated a lack of desire to pursue the petition and sought withdrawal. The court granted the withdrawal and dismissed the present petition.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~14
ADITYA KUMAR .....Petitioner
Through: Ms. Kanika Baweja, Advocate
versus
M/S NAVYUG IRON TRADERS AND ORS. .....Respondent Through: Mr. Anurag Jain & Ms. Divya Maghan, Advocates
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAIN
states that as per the instructions, petitioner is no longer desirous of pursuing the present petition.
MANOJ JAIN, J
JULY 11, 2024/ dr
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 19/07/2024 at 14:52:53
ADITYA KUMAR
M/S NAVYUG IRON TRADERS AND ORS.
MANOJ JAIN
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 227 of the Constitution invoking the High Court's supervisory jurisdiction over subordinate civil courts.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
