Petitioner challenged the order dismissing his restoration application before the Appellate Tribunal. Court restored the appeal upon confirmation of cost deposit with the Tribunal.
petition disposed of; appeal in Tribunal deemed restored and case remanded for proceedings.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~3
CHAKRESH KUMAR THROUGH LRS SHUBHAM AGGARWAL .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Varun Jain, Advocate. versus
MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI THROUGH ITS COMMISSIONER .....Respondent Through: None.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAIN
O R D E R
% 12.07.2024
CM(M) 2016/2023 1
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 02/07/2025 at 03:05:37
MANOJ JAIN, J
JULY 12, 2024/ss
CM(M) 2016/2023 2
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 02/07/2025 at 03:05:37
Chakresh Kumar Through LRS Shubham Aggarwal
Municipal Corporation of Delhi Through Its Commissioner
Manoj Jain
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 227 of the Constitution invoking the High Court's supervisory jurisdiction over subordinate civil courts.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
