In this writ petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution, the Delhi High Court dismissed the application as withdrawn by the decree holders after granting an ex-parte direction for a fresh auction of the property in the interest of justice.
Fresh auction sale to be initiated by the Executing Court.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~63
JAGDISH SINGH & ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Pradeep Kumar with Mr. Monica Kumar, Advocates with petitioner No.2 in person.
versus
S. JASPAL SINGH .....Respondent Through: Mr. Rajeev Saxena with respondent in person, Advocate.
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAIN
O R D E R % 10.07.2024
CM(M) 2884/2024
1
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 02/07/2025 at 03:20:21
MANOJ JAIN, J
JULY 10, 2024 st
CM(M) 2884/2024
2
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 02/07/2025 at 03:20:21
1 issue framed by the court
Whether execution proceedings under Article 227 of the Constitution of India ought to be allowed when the petitioners have withdrawn the petition.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
JAGDISH SINGH & ORS.
S. JASPAL SINGH
MANOJ JAIN
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 227 of the Constitution invoking the High Court's supervisory jurisdiction over subordinate civil courts.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
