Petitioner sought withdrawal of petition due to settlement. Respondents admitted settlement via videoconferencing. Court dismissed the petition as withdrawn.
Proceedings dismissed as withdrawn in terms of settlement.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~59
PANKAJ AGARWAL & ORS .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Udaibir Singh Kochar, Mr. Pushkar Khanna, Advocates along with Petitioner No. 3 in person
versus
R.N TOWERS PVT LTD & ORS
.....Respondent Through: Mr. Sharat Kapoor and Mr. Bhavyah Garg, Advocates for R-3.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAIN
O R D E R
% 11.07.2024 CM APPL. 38455/2024 and CM(M) 1302/2019
MANOJ JAIN, J
JULY 11, 2024/ dr
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 19/07/2024 at 14:51:59
Pankaj Agarwal & Ors
R.N Towers Pvt Ltd & Ors
Manoj Jain
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 227 of the Constitution invoking the High Court's supervisory jurisdiction over subordinate civil courts.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
