Regular bail application in FIR under Sections 376/354(C)/506 IPC and Section 67 IT Act; petitioner sought leave to withdraw the application. Court dismissed the petition as withdrawn, noting committal to Sessions and directing expeditious recording of complainant's testimony within three months.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~11
versus THE STATE .....Respondent Through: Ms. Meenakshi Dahiya, APP for the State with SI Ambika, PS S B Dairy Ms. Anita Saini, Adv. for R-2
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANISH DAYAL O R D E R
% 08.07.2024
ANISH DAYAL, J
JULY 8, 2024/sm
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 02/07/2025 at 02:37:11
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Amrit Raj @ Amit Raj
The State
Anish Dayal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
