Dismissed
Mukesh Mishra v. State
Delhi HCBAIL APPLN./1128/2024
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Petitioner sought bail extension for N.D.P.S. offence but withdrew the plea. Bench dismissed the petition as withdrawn and directed surrender or treated pending applications as infructuous.
What did the court decide?
Petition dismissed as withdrawn; surrender within a week directed.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
$~13
¶2
- IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
¶3
- BAIL APPLN. 1128/2024
¶4
MUKESH MISHRA .....Petitioner
¶5
Through: Ms. Sushma Sharma, Adv (thru VC) versus
¶6
STATE .....Respondent Through: Mr. Aman Usman, APP for the State
¶7
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANISH DAYAL
¶8
O R D E R
¶9
- % 08.07.2024
¶10
- This petition is filed seeking extension of interim bail for a period of 8 weeks in FIR No. 532/ 2022, PS Seemapuri, under Section 20 N.D.P.S. Act.
¶11
- Counsel for petitioner states on instructions that she is not pressing extension of interim bail.
¶12
- Petitioner has been diagnosed as suffering from leprosy; he has already undergone reconstructive surgery.
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- petitioner
Mukesh Mishra
- respondent
State
Coram
AI extract
Anish Dayal
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court