Allowed

Mrs Kiran Devi v. Amit Gupta

Delhi HC2 Apr 2024ARB.P./1080/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner sought appointment of a sole arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 regarding rent disputes. With respondent's consent, court referred disputes to DIAC., directing nominee appointment and adherence to fee schedule while leaving merits open.

What did the court decide?

Disputes under the agreement referred to DIAC; nominee to be appointed per fees schedule; rights on merits left open.

Mrs Kiran Devi Vs Amit Gupta — Arbitration | Delhi HC (2024)

¶1

$~1

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- ARB.P. 1080/2023, I.As. 20401-02/2023

¶4

MRS KIRAN DEVI ..... Petitioner

¶5

Through: Mr. Rohit Kumar Singh, Adv.

¶6

versus

¶7

AMIT GUPTA ..... Respondent

¶8

Through: Respondent in person.

¶9

CORAM:

¶10

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SHARMA

¶11

O R D E R % 02.04.2024

¶12

By way of the present petition filed under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter, referred to as the „A&C Act‟ ), the petitioner seeks appointment of an Arbitral Tribunal comprising of a sole arbitrator, to adjudicate the disputes between the parties.

¶13

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the parties had entered into a Rent Agreement dated 19.10.2020 and subsequently renewed on 30.10.2021 for Flat No. CGL-162, Tower L, situated at DLF Capital Greens-II, Shivaji Marg, Moti Nagar, New Delhi-15 for residential purposes.

¶14

The petitioner‟s case is that as per the rent agreement, the respondent was required to pay a monthly rent of Rs.39,000/- in advance by the 7^th day of each calendar month. It has been submitted that while extending the rent agreement on 30.10.2021, it was common

¶15

This is a digitally signed order.

¶16

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 15/04/2024 at 11:40:40

¶17

understanding that the monthly rent enhanced to Rs.41,000/- per month, and thereafter the rent was supposed to be enhanced to Rs.46,000/- in terms of clause 2(i) of the rent agreement dated 30.10.2021. The clause also provided that the rent is required to be enhanced at the rate of 5% after every 11 months.

¶18

Learned counsel submits that the petitioner is not making the payment of regular monthly rent. It has been submitted that the respondent has not paid the rent for the months of February 2023 to July 2023. The legal notice dated 24.04.2023 was duly served and thereafter the arbitration clause was invoked vide notice dated 26.05.2023. Clause -14 of the Lease agreement dated 19.10.2020 provides the arbitration clause with the jurisdiction at Delhi.

¶19

Respondent is appearing through VC and submits that the matter may be referred to the arbitration. 6. Considering that both the parties have consented to the reference to the arbitral tribunal, the present petition is disposed of with the following directions:

¶20

i) The disputes between the parties under the said agreement are referred to the arbitral tribunal.

¶21

ii) As agreed by both parties, DIAC shall nominate an Arbitrator to adjudicate the disputes between the parties.

¶22

iii) The arbitration will be held under the aegis of the Delhi International Arbitration Centre, Delhi High Court, Sher Shah Road, New Delhi hereinafter, referred to as the „DIAC‟). The remuneration of the learned Arbitrator shall be in terms of the Fees Schedule of DIAC or as the parties may agree.

¶23

This is a digitally signed order.

¶24

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 15/04/2024 at 11:40:40

¶25

iv) The learned Arbitrator is requested to furnish a declaration in terms of Section 12 of the Act prior to entering into the reference. v) It is made clear that all the rights and contentions of the parties, including as to the arbitrability of any of the claims, any other preliminary objection, as well as claims on merits of the dispute of either of the parties, are left open for adjudication by the learned arbitrator.

¶26

vi) The parties shall approach the learned arbitrator within two weeks from today.

¶27

The pending application(s) also stand disposed of.

¶28

DINESH KUMAR SHARMA, J

¶29

APRIL 2, 2024 Pallavi

¶30

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 15/04/2024 at 11:40:40

Mrs Kiran Devi v. Amit Gupta

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mrs Kiran Devi v. Amit Gupta

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Pradeep Kumar Aggarwal Vs Anoop Aggarwal

M/S Shiv Polymer Vs Pawan Goyal

M/S Jas Toll Road Company Ltd. Vs National Highway Authority of India

Smt. Babita Goel Vs M/S Alyssum Infrabuilder LLP & Ors.

Divine Infracon Private Limited Vs Sk Gupta and Ors.

Paramjeet Singh Narula Vs Delhi Development Authority