Petitioner sought withdrawal of an arbitration petition after documents revealed the correct proprietor, seeking liberty to file a fresh petition against her with the same cause of action.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~2
M/S SHIV POLYMER ..... Petitioner
Through: Mr. Abu John Mathew, Adv. (VC).
Versus
PAWAN GOYAL ..... Respondent Through:
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SHARMA
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that now it has transpired from certain documents that Ms. Vijay Laxmi is the proprietor of M/s Swatik Packaging, A-40, Swastik Packaging, Delhi-110052.
Learned counsel submits that he may be allowed to withdraw the present petition with liberty to file fresh petition with the same cause of action against Ms. Vijay Laxmi, the proprietor of M/s Swatik Packaging, A- 40, Swastik Packaging, Delhi-110052.
Liberty granted.
In view of the above, the present petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
DINESH KUMAR SHARMA, J
APRIL 1, 2024/AR..
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 05/04/2024 at 12:15:39
M/S Shiv Polymer
Pawan Goyal
Dinesh Kumar Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
