Petitioner sought withdrawal of its writ petition against the Directorate of Enforcement; counsel stated she had instructions to withdraw. The court dismissed the petition as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~27
Through: Ms. Kartika Sharma, Ms. Vanshita Gupta and Ms. Akshaya Jebakumar, Advocates .
versus
DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT & ANR. ..... Respondents Through Mr. Anupam S. Sharma, Special Counsel with Ms. Harpreet Kalsi, Advocate for R-1.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULA O R D E R % 02.07.2024
SANJEEV NARULA, J
JULY 2, 2024 as
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 03/07/2025 at 10:02:58
Sanocs Spirits and Wines Pvt. Ltd.
Directorate of Enforcement
Sanjeev Narula
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
