Writ petition withdrawn by counsel as prayers rendered infructuous; dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~26
Through: Ms. Kheyali Singh and Ms. Neha Khanduri, Advocates.
versus
UNION OF INDIA THROUGH MINISTRY OF INFORMETION AND BROADCASTING & ORS. ..... Respondents
Through: Mr. Amit Tiwari, CGSC with Mr. Vedansh Anand, GP for UOI. Mr. Abhishek Malhotra and Ms. Sonal Chhablani, Advocates for R-2. Mr. Saikrishna Rajagopal, Ms. Sneha Jain, Mr. Devvrat Joshi and Mr. Angad S. Makkar, Advocates for R-3.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULA O R D E R % 02.07.2024
SANJEEV NARULA, J
JULY 2, 2024
as
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 03/07/2025 at 10:02:57
Aantarrashtriya Pushtimargiya Vaishnav Parishad
Union of India through Ministry of Information and Broadcasting
Sanjeev Narula
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
