Petitioner sought refund of misplaced court fees for Letters of Administration. Court directed Respondents to specify required documentation for refund within two weeks.
Directions issued for Respondents to specify documentation for refund within two weeks and refund upon receipt of documents.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~4
RUCHI SAGAR ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Ninad Dogra, Advocate,
versus
GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI AND ANR ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Rishabh Srivastava, Advocate for GNCTD.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULA
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 23/07/2024 at 15:05:10
SANJEEV NARULA, J
JULY 1, 2024 as
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 23/07/2024 at 15:05:10
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Respondents can be directed to refund court fees wrongly purchased when no specific provision for refund exists but documentation can be furnished.
RUCHI SAGAR
GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI
SANJEEV NARULA
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
