The High Court held that the writ petition abated due to the petitioner's death and the lack of substitution steps within the limitation period under Order XXII CPC, dismissing the matter.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~21
versus
THE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS .....Respondents Through: Mr. Yeeshu Jain, ASC with Ms.Jyoti Tyagi and Ms. Sonu Kumari, Advocates for Respondents No.1 and 2.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH
O R D E R % 09.08.2024
JYOTI SINGH, J
AUGUST 9, 2024
B.S. Rohella
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 13/08/2024 at 11:51:47
Pushpa Kumari Kapoor
The Govt of NCT of Delhi
Jyoti Singh
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
