The Delhi High Court directed the petitioner to approach the appropriate authority under Section 42(5) of the Electricity Act, 2003 within two weeks, noting an existing interim order restraining disconnection of supply.
Direction to approach the Electricity Act authority within two weeks; interim order in force.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~59
Versus
BSES YAMUNA POWER LIMITED AND ANOTHER
.....Respondents Through: Mr. Deepak Kumar Vijay, Adv. for R-1
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV
PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV, J
AUGUST 8, 2024 p’ma
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 14/08/2024 at 11:40:38
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the petitioner can approach the Court directly without exhausting the remedy under Section 42(5) of the Electricity Act, 2003.
Whether the interim order restraining disconnection of electricity supply should remain in force pending the complaint.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Neha Shorawal
BSES Yamuna Power Limited
Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
