Writ petition dismissed in default as petitioners did not appear when called and had been absent since 2019, indicating lack of interest in prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~2
RAJINDER KUMAR & ANR ..... Petitioners
Through: None.
versus
UNION OF INDIA & ORS ..... Respondents
Through: Mr. Balendu Shekhar, CGSC with Mr. Krishna Chaitanya, Mr. Raj Kumar Maurya, Advocates
CORAM: HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE SUDHIR KUMAR JAIN
O R D E R
% 25.01.2024
DR. SUDHIR KUMAR JAIN, J
JANUARY 25, 2024/j
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 15/06/2024 at 11:57:35
Rajinder Kumar & Anr
Union of India & Ors
Sudhir Kumar Jain
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
