A petitioner whose statutory appeal against dismissal from a bank remained undecided since filing obtained a writ petition directing the appellate authority to dispose of the appeal. The Court directed the appeal to be disposed of within six weeks, with natural justice protections and reasoned order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~52
PUNJAB AND SIND BANK AND OTHERS ..... Respondent
Advocates who appeared in this case:
For the Petitioner : Mr. S.K. Gupta and Mr. Udit Gupta, Advocates For the Respondent : Mr. Rajesh Kumar Gautam, Mr. Anant Gautam, Mr. Dinesh Sharma, Ms. Anani Achumi and Ms. Shivani Sagar, Advocates
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TUSHAR RAO GEDELA
JUDGMENT
TUSHAR RAO GEDELA, J. (ORAL)
[ The proceeding has been conducted through Hybrid mode ]
CM APPL. 2678/2024
W.P.(C) 592/2024
Signature Not Verified
Digitally Signed By:VINOD KUMAR Signing Da te:2 9.01.2024 16:01:17
W.P.(C) 592/2024
Page 1 of 2
petitioner dated 06.06.2023, whereby the petitioner challenged the order of dismissal dated 28.04.2023.
TUSHAR RAO GEDELA, J.
JANUARY 24, 2024 Aj
Signature Not Verified
Digitally Signed By:VINOD KUMAR Signing Da te:2 9.01.2024 16:01:17
W.P.(C) 592/2024
Page 2 of 2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the appellate authority should be directed to decide the petitioner's pending statutory appeal against dismissal within a stipulated period.
Shreya Suman
Punjab and Sind Bank
Tushar Rao Gedela
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
