Petitioner failed to appear for hearing over 2-3 dates. Court concluded petitioner was not interested, leading to dismissal in default and for want of prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~48
Ms. Shiva Lakshmi, CGSC with Mr. Vishal Singh, Advocate
CORAM: HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE SUDHIR KUMAR JAIN O R D E R % 24.01.2024
DR. SUDHIR KUMAR JAIN, J
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 15/06/2024 at 11:57:29
VIJAYDEEP
GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI
SUDHIR KUMAR JAIN
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
