Petitioner sought leave to withdraw writ petition alleging illegal construction as requisite action was taken, dismissing the petition accordingly.
Leave to withdraw the petition granted; petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~5
SANDEEP KASANA ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Faraz Khan, Adv. (through VC)
versus
MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI AND OTHERS
..... Respondent Through: Mr. Anuj Chaturvedi, Standing Counsel, for MCD. Ms. Avni Singh, Adv. for Respondent-2.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN DATTA
O R D E R % 29.01.2024
The hearing has been conducted through video-conferencing.
CM APPL. 3917/2024 (exemption)
Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.
The application stands disposed of.
W.P.(C) 949/2024
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 15/06/2024 at 11:57:41
grievance of the petitioner does not survive. The petitioner accordingly seeks leave to withdraw the present petition.
SACHIN DATTA, J
JANUARY 29, 2024/r
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 15/06/2024 at 11:57:41
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to allow withdrawal of the petition alleging illegal construction.
SANDEEP KASANA
MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI
SACHIN DATTA
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
