Writ petition dismissed as withdrawn by the petitioner with liberty to take recourse to other legal remedies.
dismissed as withdrawn with liberty
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~11
SHUSHMITA DEY AND ORS .....Petitioners
Through: Mr. Himanshu Chaubey and Mr. Gourang Dubey, Advocates.
versus
UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Sumer Singh Boparai, Mr. Sidhant Saraswat and Mr. Surya Pratap Singh, Advocates for R-2. Mr. Sanjay Bhatt, Advocate for Resolution Professional. Mr. Sumesh Dhawan, Ms. Vatsala Kak and Mr. Raghav Dembla, Advocates for R-4. Mr. Asheesh Jain, CGSC with Mr. Gaurav Kumar and Ms. Pooja Bhardwaj, Advocates for R-1. Mr. Meeran Maqbool, Advocate for R-6, 7. Mr. Gaurav Mitra and Mr. Deboshree Saha, Advocates for R-5. Mr. Pulkit Deora and Ms. Maitreyee Mishra, Advocates for R-3. Mr. Apoorv Agarwal and Ms. Divya Verma, Advocates for R-11, 12.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULA
O R D E R
% 04.09.2024
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 05/09/2024 at 12:21:18
the Petitioners, states that he would like to withdraw the present petition with liberty to take recourse to other legal remedies as are available under law.
SANJEEV NARULA, J
SEPTEMBER 4, 2024 nk
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 05/09/2024 at 12:21:18
Shushmita Dey and Ors.
Union of India and Ors.
Sanjeev Narula
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
