Disposed

Madhu Naresh & Ors. v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Ors.

Delhi HC3 Sept 2024W.P.(C)/12286/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petition by long-time street vendors at Janpath for allotment of tehbazari sites and constitution of a permanent Town Vending Committee. Court declined site allotment as petitioners were unlicensed at the relevant time and not on the 2012 survey list, and directed respondents to complete vendor survey, constitute TVC and prepare a vending plan.

What the court decided

AI extract

Madhu Naresh & Ors. Vs Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Ors. — Municipal and Town Planning | Delhi HC (2024)

¶1

$~57

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- W.P.(C) 12286/2024 CM APPL. 51058/2024, 51059/2024, 51060/2024

¶4

MADHU NARESH & ORS. .....Petitioners

¶5

Through: Mr. Pravin H. Parekh, Sr. Adv. alongwith Mr. Vishol Prasad, Mr. Ritika Sethi and Mr. Aman Anand, Advocates.

¶6

versus

¶7

GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mohd. Irshad, ASC (GNCTD) alongwith Ms. Nasreen and Mr. Kunal Raj, Advocates.

¶8

CORAM:

¶9

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN DATTA

¶10

O R D E R % 03.09.2024

¶11

The petitioner has filed the present petition, inter alia , praying that the directions be issued to the respondents to allot tehbazari sites for carrying on their vending activities.

¶12

The petitioners claim that they are street vendors and have been carrying on their business at Janpath, New Delhi and the nearby areas for the past two decades. The petitioners also pray that directions be also issued to the respondent no(s). 1 to 3 to constitute a competent/permanent Town Vending Committee (hereafter TVC ).

¶13

Mr. Parekh, learned senior counsel appearing for the petitioners, has drawn the attention of this Court to a letter dated 22.12.2021 sent by the Enforcement Department of New Delhi Municipal Council (NDMC) to a Member of Parliament, informing him that the present TVC is temporary in

¶14

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 12/09/2024 at 12:23:23

¶15

nature and has been constituted for the purpose of conducting the survey of street vendors and, therefore, it cannot consider the request for granting permission to carry out vending activities. He submits that directions ought to be issued to the respondents for constitution of a TVC in accordance with law.

¶16

Insofar as the petitioners’ prayer for directions be issued to the respondents for grant of tehbazari license is concerned, this Court is unable to accede to the same.

¶17

Admittedly, the petitioners were not holding tehbazari license on the date when the Street Vendors (Protection of Livelihood and Regulation of Street Vending) Act, 2014 (hereafter Street Vendors Act ) came into force.

¶18

A survey was conducted in the year 2012 and a list of 628 eligible street vendors was drawn up at the directions of the Court for allotment of 386 tehbazari sites that were identified at the material time. Admittedly, the names of the petitioners do not feature in the said list.

¶19

The petitioners have produced various challans , most of them pertain to the period prior to 2012. However, there is one challan which is of the year 2024. In this view as well, we are unable to conclude that the petitioners were carrying on vending activities on the date when the Street Vendors Act came into force or have been continuously carrying on vending activities at the sites as mentioned in the petition.

¶20

It is also material to note that the areas of Indira Chowk and Rajiv Chowk have been declared as no-vending zones.

¶21

Insofar as the constitution of TVC is concerned, this Court is informed that the process for undertaking the survey of the street vendors is underway. After the survey is complete, the TVC would be constituted

¶22

¶23

which would also include the representatives of various street vendors. 10. Section 21 of the Street Vendors Act also requires the concerned local authorities to prepare a vending plan in consultation with the TVC. It is apparent that the allocation of tehbazari sites to the street vendors is also required to be done in accordance with the vending plan.

¶24

In view of the above, we consider it apposite to dispose of this petition by directing the respondents to complete the process of survey of the street vendors expeditiously; take necessary steps for constitution of TVC and preparation of a vending plan.

¶25

It is clarified that the petitioners are also not precluded from participating in the survey and furnishing all material documents to the concerned authorities at the appropriate stage. Needless to state that the concerned authorities shall consider the same at the relevant stage.

¶26

The present petition is disposed of in the aforesaid terms.

¶27

Pending applications also stand disposed of.

¶28

VIBHU BAKHRU, J

¶29

SACHIN DATTA, J

¶30

SEPTEMBER 03, 2024 at

¶31

This is a digitally signed order.

¶32

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 12/09/2024 at 12:23:23

Madhu Naresh & Ors. v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

Madhu Naresh & Ors. v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

National Power Training Institute Vs Office of Chief Commissioner for Persons With Disability & Ors.

M/S Microsoft India R and D Pvt. Ltd. Vs Principal Commissioner of Income Tax -4 & Anr.

Smart Cube India Pvt. Ltd. Vs Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax Circle 22(2)

W.C Nanda and Anr. Vs Municipal Corporation of Delhi and Ors.

M C Mittal Vs the Commissioner, Municipal Corporation of Delhi and Ors.

Ruchika Jain & Anr. Vs Govt of NCT of Delhi & Ors.

Sh. Sumat Prasad Jain & Anr. Vs Govt. of NCT Delhi & Ors.

Union of India & Ors. Vs Ex Nk Mohan Singh

M/S. Dinodia Fashions through Its Prop. Sh. Amit Kumar Gupta Vs Union of India and Ors.

Ram Sagar Sharma Vs Municipal Corporation of Delhi and Others

Abdul Aziz Malik Vs Union of India & Ors.

Bolt Technology Ou Vs Ujoy Technology Private Limited & Ors.

Saluja Overseas Pvt. Ltd. Vs Commissioner of Cgst and Central Excise Delhi East Commissionerate

M/S Balaji Tyres Plaza Vs Union of India & Anr.