Counsel for petitioners withdrew the writ petition because the eviction had already been effected and possession was with the petitioners, making the relief infructuous.
Writ petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~16
SH. SUMAT PRASAD JAIN & ANR. .....Petitioners
Through: Ms. Meera Kaura Patel, Ms. Ritika Saini, Mr. Aditya Tripathi and Mr. Puru Pratap Singh, Advocates.
versus
GOVT. OF NCT DELHI & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Harshita Nathrani, Advocate for R-1 to 3.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULA
O R D E R % 04.09.2024
SANJEEV NARULA, J
SEPTEMBER 4, 2024
as
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 06/09/2024 at 15:35:32
SH. SUMAT PRASAD JAIN & ANR.
GOVT. OF NCT DELHI & ORS.
SANJEEV NARULA
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
