The petition was dismissed in default for want of prosecution as the petitioners had not appeared and were deemed not interested in proceeding with the writ petition.
The present petition along with pending application is dismissed in default as well as for want of prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~54
GNCT AND ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Satyakam, ASC for GNCTD. Mr. Rajkumar Yadav, Advocate for R-3.
CORAM:
DR. SUDHIR KUMAR JAIN, J
FEBRUARY 9, 2024 N
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 16/12/2024 at 16:44:17
Anita Aggarwal and Ors.
GNCT and Ors.
Sudhir Kumar Jain
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
