In default order, High Court dismissed the writ petition as well as pending applications for want of prosecution. The petitioner, who failed to appear on previous hearing dates including the last date of hearing, was deemed not interested in pursuing thepetition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~11
versus
UNION OF INDIA & ANR ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Ripu Daman Bhardwaj, CGSC with Mr. Kushagra Kumar and Ms. K. Manaswini, Advocates for UOI.
CORAM:
HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE SUDHIR KUMAR JAIN O R D E R
% 12.02.2024
DR. SUDHIR KUMAR JAIN, J
FEBRUARY 12, 2024 N
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 17/12/2024 at 15:11:41
M/S A.J. INTERNATIONAL
UNION OF INDIA
SUDHIR KUMAR JAIN
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
