A writ petition seeking quashing of a decision to suspend the petitioner's Twitter account was dismissed because the petitioner withdrew the petition after the account was restored.
The petition was allowed to be withdrawn and stood dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~43
DIMPLE KAUL ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Mukesh Sharma, Mr. Raghav Awasthi, Ms. Lohitaksha Shukla and Mr. Kunal Tiwari, Advocates.
versus UNION OF INDIA & ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Ripu Daman Bhardwaj, CGSC with Mr. Sahaj Garg, GP for UOI. Ms. Shloka Narayanan and Mr. Abhishek Kumar, Advocates for X Corp/R-2.
CORAM: HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE SUDHIR KUMAR JAIN O R D E R % 07.02.2024
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 16/12/2024 at 14:41:38
the petitioner has already been restored by the respondent no. 2.
DR. SUDHIR KUMAR JAIN, J
FEBRUARY 7, 2024 N
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 16/12/2024 at 14:41:38
Dimple Kaul
Union of India
Sudhir Kumar Jain
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
