Petition filed under Article 226 to quash suspension of Twitter account by Respondent 2. Court noted that the account was restored and the petition was withdrawn, and dismissed it as such.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~44
SUYASH DEEP RAI ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Mukesh Sharma, Mr. Raghav Awasthi, Ms. Lohitaksha Shukla and Mr. Kunal Tiwari, Advocates.
versus
UNION OF INDIA & ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Vaibhav Gaggar and Mr. Dev P. Bhardwaj, SPC with Mr. Jitendra Kumar Tripathi, GP and Mr. Dhruv Kothari Kathait, Advocate for UOI. Ms. Shloka Narayanan and Mr. Abhishek Kumar, Advocates for X Corp/R-2.
CORAM:
HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE SUDHIR KUMAR JAIN O R D E R % 07.02.2024
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 16/12/2024 at 14:36:56
DR. SUDHIR KUMAR JAIN, J
FEBRUARY 7, 2024 N/abk
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 16/12/2024 at 14:36:56
1 provisions across 1 enactments
SUYASH DEEP RAI
UNION OF INDIA
X CORP
SUDHIR KUMAR JAIN
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
