Disposed

Kamlesh & Anr. v. South Delhi Municipal Corporation and Ors.

Delhi HC9 May 2024W.P.(C)/6777/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioners sought correction of their Certificates of Vending (COVs) due to an error reflecting an incorrect ward number. The court directed the AIILSG to print corrected COVs and the MCD to rectify data on the cloud platform and issue correct certificates within two weeks.

What did the court decide?

Directed AIILSG to print correct COVs with accurate ward number S-101 within two weeks; directed MCD to rectify cloud data and issue corrected certificates.

Kamlesh & Anr. Vs South Delhi Municipal Corporation and… — Service and Employment | Delhi HC (2024)

¶1

$~26

¶2

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 6777/2022 CM APPL. 20599/2022 CM APPL. 60521/2023 KAMLESH & ANR.

¶3

	..... Petitioners
Through:	Mr.Bibhuti Bhushan Mishra,
	Mr.Dipak Raj, Mr.Kamlesh Kr
	Mishra, Ms.Tripti Juyal, Mr.Jatin Solanki and Mr.Kulsm Hasan, Advocates.
versus
SOUTH DELHI MUNICIPAL	CORPORATION AND ORS ..... Respondents
Through:	Mr.Tushar Sannu, SC, Mr.Satyam
	Sondhi, Mr.Hardik Saxena and
	Mr.Manoviraj Singh, Advocates for MCD.
	Mr. Abhinav Garg, PC and Mr. Mihir Gujjewar, Advocate for GNCTD.
	Mr.Roshan Lal Goel and Ms.Anju Goel, Advocates for R5/AIILSG.

¶4

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE TARA VITASTA GANJU O R D E R

¶5

¶6

09.05.2024

¶7

Both the petitioners have filed the present petition, inter alia, praying that their Certificates of Vending (hereafter the COVs ) be corrected to reflect their correct place of vending as ‘Central Zone Ward No.S-101 instead of ‘Central Zone, Ward S-103’.

¶8

The Municipal Corporation of Delhi (hereafter the MCD ) had filed the counter affidavit stating that the petitioners’ request for correction of

¶9

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 03/07/2025 at 18:44:05

¶10

their COVs was forwarded to the concerned agency – All India Institute of Local Self Government, New Delhi (hereafter the AIILSG ) – for necessary correction. And, the said correction is required to be carried out by the AIILSG. Accordingly, the notice was issued to AIILSG.

¶11

Mr.Goel, learned counsel appearing on behalf of AIILSG along with Mr.Pashim Tiwari, Technical Director, submits that a survey was carried out and instead of writing their Ward number, the petitioners had indicated their place of vending as Sarita Vihar, which falls in Central Zone, Ward No.S101. However, while translating the same, the ward number was incorrectly reflected as Central Zone, Ward-S-103.

¶12

He also submits that although there is no cavil that error has crept in the printing of the COVs, but AIILSG cannot carry out any correction. The MCD has appointed another agency – Kash IT Solutions Private Limited – and the entire data relating to the survey conducted by AIILSG was handed over to the said agency. He submits that AIILSG can print the corrected COVs but will not be able to carry out corrections in the master data. This Court is informed that the agency – Kash IT Solutions Private Limited – appointed by the MCD only has the access to the cloud platform and currently, the said agency is not responsive.

¶13

In view of the above, we direct AIILSG to print the correct COVs of the petitioners so as to depict the correct area of vending activities of the petitioners as ‘Central Zone Ward No.S-101’ in place of ‘Central Zone, Ward-S-103’ within a period of two weeks from date. After printing, the correct COVs be handed over to the MCD. The MCD shall hand over the corrected COVs to the petitioners on their approaching the MCD and surrendering earlier original COVs. The MCD shall also take steps to ensure

¶14

¶15

that the data of COVs is rectified on the cloud platform so as to reflect the correct place of vending of the petitioners.

¶16

The petition stands disposed of in the above terms. All pending applications also stand disposed of.

¶17

VIBHU BAKHRU, J

¶18

TARA VITASTA GANJU, J

¶19

MAY 09, 2024 M

¶20

Click here to check corrigendum, if any

¶21

Kamlesh & Anr. v. South Delhi Municipal Corporation and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Kamlesh & Anr. v. South Delhi Municipal Corporation and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mohd. Rafi Vs Municipal Corporation of Delhi and Ors.

N Vs the Principal Secretary Health and Family Welfare Department & Ors.

Vinod Kumar Pandey Vs M/S General Industrial Company

Sanjay Raghunath Piplani and Anr. Vs National Buildings Construction Corporation Delhi and Anr.

Ashok Kumar Vs at Home India Pvt. Ltd. and Anr.

Swastik Traders Vs Commissioner of Vat and Anr.

Govt of NCT of Delhi and Ors. Vs M K Aggarwal and Ors.

Satwik Raj Vs Jawaharlal Nehru University and Anr.

Ms Harey Krishna Corporation Vs Servotech Power Systems Ltd. & Anr.

Bausch and Lomb India Private Limited Vs Assessment Unit, National Faceless Assessment Centre, Delhi

Wieden+ Kennedy India Private Limited Vs Jindal Steel and Power Limited

Sh. Ghanshyam Dass Vs Union of India and Anr.

Sh. Rattan Lal Vs Union of India and Anr.

Sh Ram Nath & Ors. Vs Union of India & Anr.