Petitioner withdrew writ petition challenging rejection of relaxation in post-graduation marks for physically handicapped candidates. Court disposed of petition noting fresh PIL would be considered on merits.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~17
..... Petitioner Through: Dr. Krishan Mahajan, Adv.
versus
UNIVERSITY GRANTS COMMISSION
..... Respondent Through: Mr.Manoj Ranjan Sinha, Adv.
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAURABH BANERJEE O R D E R % 06.05.2024
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 08/05/2024 at 12:46:39
counsel for the petitioner seeks leave to withdraw the petition and submits that the petitioner will be filing a PIL seeking a direction to the UGC to take appropriate steps for granting relaxation in marks and making reservation for persons with disabilities in accordance with the mandate under the ‘Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act’, 2016.
REKHA PALLI, J
SAURABH BANERJEE, J
MAY 6, 2024 acm
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 08/05/2024 at 12:46:39
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Pratap Singh Bist
University Grants Commission
Rekha Palli
Saurabh Banerjee
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
