Petitioner prayed for directions to restrain media disclosure of investigation details and to remove content associating his name with pending investigation. Court relied on Home Ministry guidelines.
The petition along with the pending application stands disposed of with a direction for respondents to follow the Office Memorandum dated 01.04.2010.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~4
CORAM:
HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE SUDHIR KUMAR JAIN O R D E R % 08.05.2024
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 15/05/2024 at 12:02:41
RPZO/10/2022. The petitioner has made the following prayers:-
a. Issue writ under article 226 of the Constitution of India read with section 151 of the CPC in the nature of mandamus or any other writ directing the Respondents No. 2 to not reveal the details of investigation qua the Petitioner to the media agencies till the conclusion of investigation qua the Petitioner;
b. Pass an order of the nature of John Doe to direct the media houses to remove the content from their digital media (websites, YouTube, X (formerly Twitter) etc. which connects the name of the Petitioner with the said Mahadev Book app or with respect to the investigation being carried out with respect to the said Mahadev BookApp,
c. Direct Respondent No.1/Union of India to ensure strict compliance by the concerned respondents/ media houses to comply with the guidelines established by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in PEOPLE'S UNION FOR CIVIL LIBERTIES & ANR. VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ORS. and/or
d. Such other or further orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the present case be also passed in favour of the petitioner to meet the ends of justice.
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 15/05/2024 at 12:02:41
prayed that the respondent no. 2 be retrained or be directed not to leak or give any information regarding the investigation pertaining to the petitioner in media either print or electronic.
I. Only designated officers should disseminate information to the media on major crime and law and order incidents, important detections, recoveries and other notable achievements of the police.
II. Police Officers should confine their briefings to the essential facts and not rush to the press with half-baked, speculative or unconfirmed information about ongoing investigations. The briefing should normally be done only at the following stages of a case:
a. Registration
b. Arrest of accused persons
c. Charge-sheeting of the case
d. Final outcome of case such as conviction/acquittal etc.
In a case that attracts the interest of the media, a specific time may be fixed everyday when the designated officer would make an appropriate statement on the investigation.
III. In the first 48 hours there should be no unnecessary release of information except about the facts of the incident and that the investigation has been taken up.
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 15/05/2024 at 12:02:41
IV. The general tendency to give piecemeal information/clues, on a daily/regular basis, with regard to the progress/various lines of investigation, should be strongly discouraged so that the investigations are not compromised and the criminals/suspects do not take undue advantage of information shared by the Police authorities about the likely course of the investigation.
V. Meticulous compliance with the legal provisions and Court guidelines regarding protection of the identity of juveniles and rape victims should be ensured, and under no circumstances should the identity of juveniles and victims in rape cases be disclosed to the media.
VI . Due care should be taken to ensure that there is no violation of the legal, privacy and human rights of the accused/victims.
a. Arrested persons should not be paraded before the media. b. Faces of arrested persons whose Test Identification Parade is required to be conducted should not be exposed to the media.
VII. No opinionated and judgmental statements should be made by the police while briefing the media.
VIII. As far as possible no interview of the accused/victims by the media should be permitted till the statements are recorded by the police.
IX. The professional tradecraft of policing and technical means used for the detection of criminal cases should not be disclosed as it alerts potential criminals to take appropriate precautions while planning their next crime.
X. In cases where National security is at stake, no information should be shared with the media till the whole operation is over or until all the accused persons have been apprehended.
XI. The modus operandi of carrying out the operations should not be made public. Only the particulars of apprehended persons and
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 15/05/2024 at 12:02:41
details of recovery should be revealed to the media on completion of the operations.
XII. There should not be any violation of court directions and other guidelines issued by the authorities from time to time on this matter.
XIII. Preferably, there should be one officer designated as the Public Relations Officer to handle the immediate information needs of all media persons and give the correct and factual position of any crime incident.
XIV. As and when instances of misreporting or incorrect reporting of facts/details pertaining to an incident or the department comes to notice, a suitable rejoinder should immediately be issued and, in more serious cases, the matter should be taken up at the appropriate levels for remedial action.
XV. Any deviation by the police officer/official concerned from these instructions should be viewed seriously and action should be taken against such police officer/official.
DR. SUDHIR KUMAR JAIN, J
MAY 8, 2024 N/AK
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 15/05/2024 at 12:02:41
1 issue framed by the court
Whether directions should be issued to prevent media disclosure of investigation details regarding the petitioner before the investigation concludes.
Ravi Uppal
Union of India
Sudhir Kumar Jain
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
