The High Court of Delhi dismissed a writ petition in default and for want of prosecution as the petitioner did not appear for hearing over the last four to five dates and showed no interest in pursuing the matter.
Petition, along with pending applications, stood dismissed in default as well as for want of prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~13
M/S SHIVANI INDUSTRIES ..... Petitioner Through: None.
versus
COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS (PREV.) & ANR ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Rakesh Chaudhary and Mr.Sushaar Chaudhary, Advocates for FSSAI
CORAM:
HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE SUDHIR KUMAR JAIN
DR. SUDHIR KUMAR JAIN, J
MAY 8, 2024 N
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 15/05/2024 at 11:59:00
M/S SHIVANI INDUSTRIES
COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS (PREV.)
SUDHIR KUMAR JAIN
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
