Petitioner failed to appear on multiple hearing dates. Court observed loss of interest and dismissed the writ petition in default and for non-prosecution.
Petitioner reported as having lost interest; petition dismissed in default and non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~13
SANDEEP DABAS .....Petitioner
Through: None. versus CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION & ORS.....Respondents Through: Mr. Sanjeev Sagar, Standing Counsel for MCD with Ms. Nazia Parveen, Mr. Gaurav Dahiya, Mr. Vikas Hooda, Mr. Sumit Kumar, Mr. Sohail Khan, Ms. Rupali Panwar, Mr. Pramod Kumar Singh, Advocates for MCD.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULA
O R D E R % 21.08.2024
SANJEEV NARULA, J
AUGUST 21, 2024/ sapna
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 22/08/2024 at 12:25:36
Sandeep Dabas
Central Information Commission
Sanjeev Narula
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
