despite absence of a formal application, have been considered, and written submissions submitted across the board is taken on record. At this juncture it must also be must also be clarified that on the previous date, Mr. Alishan Naqve’s appearance was mistakenly noted as representing Respondent No. 3; he, in fact, represents Mr. Tilak Raj and Mr. Kumar Mangalam, who are seeking intervention in these proceedings. The intervenors have highlighted that Civil Suit No. CS SCJ No. 313/24,3 is pending before ACJ/CCJ/ARC(South) at Saket Court, concerning control over Respondent No. 3 society. They argue that no meeting took place on 13th June, 2018, and highlight the absence of minutes of meeting, notice, or agenda, and attendance records. They argue that the extracts from the purported meeting held on 13th June, 2018, cited by the Petitioners, reference Joint Presidents without any mention of Joint Secretaries and bear the signatures of only two out of the eight members. Additionally, they reference orders passed by the Trial Court directing Petitioners to produce minutes of the alleged meeting, emphasising Petitioners’ failure to comply despite multiple opportunities. This non-compliance, they argue, substantiates their claim that no such meeting occurred, and any purported amendment lacks the 3/4th majority required to alter the MoA and rules. Moreover, the question of whether the 13th June, 2018 meeting occurred or not and whether amendments to the MoA were validly amended to appoint Joint Presidents and Secretaries is a matter for civil adjudication, thereby precluding the Petitioners from seeking reliefs sought through writ jurisdiction. They have submitted a copy of the plaint filed in the civil suit, which seeks the following prayers:
