Dismissed

Auro Infra Private Limited v. Union of India

Delhi HC21 Aug 2024W.P.(C)/11398/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Delhi High Court directed the petitioner to approach the appropriate Tribunal under Section 27 of the Coal Mines (Special Provisions) Act, 2015 regarding appropriation of a bank guarantee. No interim relief was granted beyond staying further action until the Tribunal decides.

What did the court decide?

Direction to approach the appropriate Tribunal under Section 27 of the Act; stay of further action on the impugned order pending Tribunal decision.

Auro Infra Private Limited Vs Union of India — Contract and Commercial Disputes | Delhi HC (2024)

¶1

$~98

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- W.P.(C) 11398/2024 & CM APPLs. 47275/2024, 47276/2024

¶4

AURO INFRA PRIVATE LIMITED .....Petitioner

¶5

Through: Mr. Abhimanyu Bhandari, Senior Advocate with Ms. Nattasha Garg and Mr. Thakur Ankit Singh, Advocates.

¶6

versus

¶7

UNION OF INDIA .....Respondent Through: Mr. Kirtiman Singh, CGSC with Mr. Waize Ali Noor, Mr. Ranjeev Khatana, Mr. Maulik Khurrana and Mr. Varun Pratap Singh, Advocates.

¶8

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULA

¶9

O R D E R % 21.08.2024

¶10

The Petitioner has filed the present petition assailing order dated 1^st August, 2024¹ passed by Respondent for appropriation of an amount of INR 2.16 crores against the Performance Bank Guarantee furnished by the Petitioner under the Coal Mines Development and Production Agreement (CMDPA) executed on 11^th January, 2021. This Impugned Order has been passed pursuant to the recommendations of the Scrutiny Committee dated 4^th June, 2024.

¶11

The Petitioner challenges the Impugned Order as well as the recommendations of the Scrutiny Committee, contending that they have

¶12

1 “Impugned Order”

¶13

W.P.(C) 11398/2024 Page 1 of 3

¶14

This is a digitally signed order.

¶15

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 27/08/2024 at 14:00:39

¶16

failed to consider their communication dated 16^th April, 2024. The said communication explains that the non-compliance with ‘Efficiency Parameters’ under the CMDPA was on account of factors beyond their control.

¶17

In response, Mr. Kirtiman Singh, CGSC for Respondent, submits that the Petitioner has an alternate appropriate remedy available under Section 27 of the Coal Mines (Special Provisions) Act, 2015² . He further points out that the Impugned Order also makes specific reference to this provision, which reads as under:

¶18

“11. Attention is invited to Section 27 of the Coal Mines (Special Provisions) Act, 2015 providing for adjudication by the Tribunal constituted under the Coal Bearing Areas (Acquisition and Development) Act, 1957. For the instant Coal Mine, the Tribunal situated at Ranchi, Jharkhand shall have jurisdiction.”

¶19

Mr. Abhimanyu Bhandari, Senior Counsel for Petitioner, states that the Petitioner is agreeable to take recourse to Section 27 of the Act, however, he submits that the present petition was filed urgently as the Petitioner apprehended appropriation of the bank guarantee by the Respondent. Mr. Bhandari, on instructions, confirms that the bank guarantee has already been appropriated. Nonetheless, he presses for protection qua the further directions issued in the Impugned Order.

¶20

Considering the aforenoted circumstances, the present writ petition is disposed of with the following directions:

¶21

5.1. Petitioner is directed to approach the appropriate Tribunal under Section 27 of the Act.

¶22

5.2. The Petitioner shall be free to apply for interim relief within a period

¶23

W.P.(C) 11398/2024 Page 2 of 3

¶24

This is a digitally signed order.

¶25

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 27/08/2024 at 14:00:39

¶26

of two weeks from today, which shall be considered and decided by the Tribunal, in accordance with law.

¶27

5.3. Till such time that the Tribunal considers the Petitioner’s application, no further action, as contemplated in the Impugned Order dated 1^st August, 2024 read with Minutes of Meeting dated 8^th May, 2024, would be taken.

¶28

It is clarified that the Court has not examined or commented on the merits of the case. All rights and contentions of the parties are left open. The Petitioner is free to raise all the grievances, as urged in the present petition, before the Tribunal.

¶29

With the above directions, the present petition, along with pending applications, is disposed of.

¶30

SANJEEV NARULA, J

¶31

AUGUST 21, 2024 as

¶32

2 “the Act”

¶33

W.P.(C) 11398/2024 Page 3 of 3

¶34

This is a digitally signed order.

¶35

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 27/08/2024 at 14:00:39

Auro Infra Private Limited v. Union of India

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Auro Infra Private Limited v. Union of India

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Baldev Singh Vs Union of India through Its Secretary Personnel & Ors.

Dr Vijay Kumar Sharma Vs United India Insurance Co. Ltd.

Er Upendra Sharma Teachers Training College Vs National Council for Teacher Education & Anr.

Ms. Ritu Singhal Vs Lions Public School and Ors.

Rajesh Kumar Jain Vs Registrar of Cooperative Societies & Anr.

Anil Dutt Sharma Vs Lokpal of India and Anr.

S K Srivastava Vs Income Tax Appellate Tribunal and Anr.

Anuradha Bakshi Vs Union of India and Ors.

Ca Rakesh Kumar Gupta Vs Delhi High Court through Registrar General

Satish Sharma Vs State of NCT & Ors.

Dharam Pal Vs Govt of NCT Delhi & Ors.

Sandeep Dabas Vs Central Information Commission & Ors.

Mahesh Kumar Vs Govt of NCT of Delhi

Sunil Agarwal and Ors. Vs Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Ors.