Disposed

Mahesh Kumar v. Govt of NCT of Delhi

Delhi HC21 Aug 2024W.P.(C)/11554/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court dismissed a writ petition challenging a demolition notice for alleged encroachment on reserve forest land. The court directed the petitioner to approach the NGT for redressal regarding land demarcation discrepancies and granted a 10-day stay on the impugned notice.

What did the court decide?

Stay of the Impugned Notice for ten days and direction to file appropriate proceedings before the NGT.

Mahesh Kumar Vs Govt of NCT of Delhi — Land Acquisition | Delhi HC (2024)

¶1

$~99

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- W.P.(C) 11554/2024 & CM APPLs. 47935/2024, 47936/2024

¶4

MAHESH KUMAR .....Petitioner

¶5

Through: Mr. Abhishek and Mr. Himanshu Panwar, Advocates.

¶6

versus

¶7

GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Prashant Manchanda, ASC with Ms. Nancy Shah and Mr. Rohan Pratap, Advocates.

¶8

CORAM:

¶9

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULA

¶10

O R D E R % 21.08.2024

¶11

The Petitioner asserts that he is the owner of a plot of land admeasuring 550 sq. yards, described as property No. C-47, falling in Khasra No. 216 min at Village Chhatarpur, New Delhi¹ . On this land, Petitioner has constructed a multi-storey building wherein he has been residing with his family for more than 20 years.

¶12

To substantiate their ownership over the Subject Property, the Petitioner has submitted various documents, collectively marked ‘Annexure P-2’, which includes Agreement to Sell, General Power of Attorney, Affidavit, Will, Possession Letter, Receipt, etc., all dated 31^st May, 2018. Despite the Subject Property being located in an unauthorized colony—a status for which regularization has been pending since 2004—the Petitioner

¶13

W.P.(C) 11554/2024 Page 1 of 4

¶14

This is a digitally signed order.

¶15

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 22/08/2024 at 12:25:19

¶16

maintains that these documents incontrovertibly establish his ownership. 3. The immediate concern of the Petitioner that has prompted them to file the instant petition is the demolition notice dated 8^th August, 2024² issued by the Respondent– Government of NCT of Delhi (GNCTD), Department of Forest & Wildlife. The Impugned Notice reads as under:

¶17

“ GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI

¶18

DEPARTMENT OF FOREST & WILDLIFE OFFICE OF DEPUTY CONSERVATOR OF FOREST(SOUTH) NEAR DR. KA.RNI SINGH SHOOTING RANGE TUGHLAKABAD, NEW DELHI-110044

¶19

F.NO.39/DCF(S)/Land/Chhatarpur/2022-23/3567-72 08/08/2024

¶20

NOTICE

¶21

Whereas in the matter in OA No. 58/2013 titled Sonya Ghosh Vs GNCT Delhi in 08/08/2024 the Hon’ble National Green Tribunal, directions were issued vide order dated 15.01.2021 wherein

¶22

“There is urgent need to take necessary measures to protect the Ridge by taking necessary steps... protection by appropriate measures ...No non forest activity is permissible in Ridge area... We direct that the Delhi Government through Chief Secretary Delhi ... actions to be taken by the Delhi Government may include suitable protection by fencing wall and vigilance. Identification of the remaining area and action plan for removing the encroachments be ensured within next three months. Execution of the action plan will be primarily under the Chief Secretary Delhi who is also the Chairman of the Ridge Management Board.”

¶23

Whereas it is identified that Khasra No. 205 of Village Chhatarpur Tehsil Saket is notified as Reserve Forest Land as per Notification F.10(42)I/PA/DCF/93/2012-17(I) dated 24.5.1994, No, F.I(29)PA/DCF/95 dated 02.04.1996. This land has been encroached by you which is a violation UNDER Section 26of the Indian Forest Act 1927.

¶24

And therefore, all encroachers are directed to vacate the Forest land within 7 days beyond which all structures will be demolished and all material found on forest land will be seized as tools of encroachment. The

¶25

1 “Subject Property”

¶26

2 “Impugned Notice”

¶27

W.P.(C) 11554/2024 Page 2 of 4

¶28

This is a digitally signed order.

¶29

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 22/08/2024 at 12:25:19

¶30

cost of demolition shall be recovered from the encroacher found at the site.”

¶31

DY. CONSERVATOR OF FORESTS SOUTH FOREST DIVISION

¶32

To,

¶33

All encroachers in Khasra No. 205, Village Chhatarpur, Tehsil Saket.”

¶34

This notice is a direct consequence of orders from the National Green Tribunal (NGT) in OA No. 58/2013 titled ‘ Sonya Ghosh Vs GNCT Delhi ’, mandating stringent measures to protect the Ridge area from non-forest activities. The Impugned Notice explicitly identifies Khasra No. 205, Village Chhatarpur, to be encroaching upon reserve forest land, as notified under notifications dated 24^th May, 1994 and 02^nd April, 1996, and alleges violation of Section 26 of the Indian Forest Act, 1927. Accordingly, the Deputy Conservator of Forests, South Forest Division, has found the Petitioner to be encroaching on Reserve Forest Land as designated in the aforementioned notifications.

¶35

The Petitioner, on the other hand, asserts that the Subject Property falls in Khasra No. 216 min and not in Khasra No. 205, which has been identified to be Reserve Forest Land. However, as acknowledged by the counsel for Petitioner, there is no demarcation report which could identify the boundaries of the Subject Property.

¶36

Moreover, the Court notes that the Respondent has issued the Impugned Notice pursuant to the orders of the NGT. It is understood that the NGT, as a matter of practice, constitutes a Monitoring Committee, which is also in place in terms of the directions issued in OA No. 58/2013. Given the

¶37

W.P.(C) 11554/2024 Page 3 of 4

¶38

This is a digitally signed order.

¶39

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 22/08/2024 at 12:25:19

¶40

fact that the Petitioner’s assertions are predicated on factual discrepancies regarding land demarcation, it would be appropriate if they approach the NGT or the Settlement-officer under Indian Forest Act, 1927, for redressal of their grievances. Such an exercise cannot be undertaken in the present proceedings.

¶41

Counsel for Petitioner states that they are agreeable to approach the NGT, however, considering the imminent threat, they must be afforded protection till such time that the NGT takes up the matter for consideration. 8. In light of the above, the present petition is disposed of with the following directions: 8.1. The Petitioner is directed to approach the NGT under appropriate proceedings to urge the grievances raised in the petition.

¶42

8.2. To enable the Petitioner to pursue their legal remedies, it is directed that for a period of ten days from today, the Impugned Notice dated 8^th August, 2024, shall not be given effect to. It is however clarified that this interim measure is granted solely to allow the Petitioner sufficient time to seek redress through the alternate remedies and does not reflect the Court’s opinion on the merits of the case or the contentions urged by the Petitioner. 9. All rights and contentions of the parties are left open.

¶43

With the above directions, the petition, along with pending applications, is disposed of.

¶44

SANJEEV NARULA, J

¶45

AUGUST 21, 2024/ as

¶46

W.P.(C) 11554/2024 Page 4 of 4

¶47

This is a digitally signed order.

¶48

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 22/08/2024 at 12:25:19

Mahesh Kumar v. Govt of NCT of Delhi

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mahesh Kumar v. Govt of NCT of Delhi

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Baldev Singh Vs Union of India through Its Secretary Personnel & Ors.

Dr Vijay Kumar Sharma Vs United India Insurance Co. Ltd.

Er Upendra Sharma Teachers Training College Vs National Council for Teacher Education & Anr.

Ms. Ritu Singhal Vs Lions Public School and Ors.

Rajesh Kumar Jain Vs Registrar of Cooperative Societies & Anr.

Anil Dutt Sharma Vs Lokpal of India and Anr.

S K Srivastava Vs Income Tax Appellate Tribunal and Anr.

Anuradha Bakshi Vs Union of India and Ors.

Ca Rakesh Kumar Gupta Vs Delhi High Court through Registrar General

Satish Sharma Vs State of NCT & Ors.

Dharam Pal Vs Govt of NCT Delhi & Ors.

Sandeep Dabas Vs Central Information Commission & Ors.

Auro Infra Private Limited Vs Union of India

Sunil Agarwal and Ors. Vs Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Ors.