Petitioner sought direction to respondent-franchise to install electricity connection. Counsel for franchise assured fresh connection upon fresh application. Petitioner withdrew press on assurance; petition disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~64
NIRANJAN YADAV ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Subhash Chand, Adv.
versus
THE STATE (GNCTD) AND ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Ms. Rachita Garg, Mr. Apoorv Rastogi and Mr. Agam Rajput, Advs. for R1.
Mr. Rishab Raj Jain, SC for BSES RPL alongwith Mr. Raghav Awasthi, Adv.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN DATTA
O R D E R % 05.04.2024
CM APPL.20365/2024 (Exemption)
Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.
Application stands disposed of.
W.P.(C) 4974/2024
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 09/04/2024 at 12:46:58
granted by the respondent no.2 to the petitioner.
SACHIN DATTA, J
APRIL 5, 2024/at
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 09/04/2024 at 12:46:58
NIRANJAN YADAV
THE STATE (GNCTD)
BSES RPL (RE新人)
SACHIN DATTA
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
