Petitioners sought leave to withdraw their writ petition with liberty to raise arguments before the Central Administrative Tribunal (CGIT) where a related reference was pending. The Court granted leave and dismissed the petition as withdrawn.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to raise arguments before the CGIT.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~116
MEENAKSHI & ANR. ..... Petitioners
Through: Mr. Francis Paul, Advocate along with along with the petitioners in person
versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Chetan Sharma ASG with Mr. Vijay Joshi, Mr. Amit Gupta and Mr. Saurabh Tripathi, Advocates for UOI
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA DHARI SINGH
O R D E R % 08.04.2024
The petitioners along with their counsel appeared and prayed leave to withdraw the instant petition with liberty to take all the arguments and contents made in the writ petition before learned CGIT before which they have already preferred the reference i.e. I. D. No. 386/23 and the same is pending before the learned CGIT.
Leave granted.
Accordingly, the instant petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for.
CHANDRA DHARI SINGH, J
APRIL 8, 2024/gs/av
Click here to check corrigendum, if any
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 15/04/2024 at 12:01:38
MEENAKSHI & ANR.
UNION OF INDIA & ORS.
Chandra Dhari Singh
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
