Dismissed

Anjali through Father & Ors. v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Ors.

Delhi HC16 Jul 2024W.P.(C)/4873/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

PIL by minor children seeking cancellation of allotment of Khasra No.1915/2 to the Directorate of Education and its use for sports activities. The school building was already constructed; petitioners sought relief regarding an adjacent khasra not prayed for, so the petition was dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file a representation.

What the court decided

AI extract

Anjali through Father & Ors. Vs Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Ors. — Land Acquisition | Delhi HC (2024)

¶1

$~17

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- W.P.(C) 4873/2021 & CM APPL. 15025/2021,CM APPL. 17833/2021

¶4

ANJALI THROUGH FATHER & ORS. .....Petitioners

¶5

Through: Mr. Kamlesh Kumar Mishra, Ms. Snigdha, Ms. Manya Mishra, Mr. Rishi Pal and Ms. Sakshi, Advocates.

¶6

versus

¶7

GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Santosh Kumar Tripathi, SC (Civil) with Mr. Arun Panwar and Mr. Rishabh Srivastava, Advocates with Mr. Sudhir Kumar, APO, Zone 24, DOE.

¶8

CORAM: HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TUSHAR RAO GEDELA

¶9

O R D E R % 16.07.2024

¶10

Present Public Interest petition has been filed on behalf of minor children by their next friend, inter alia seeking a direction to the respondent No.1-Govt. of NCT of Delhi to cancel allotment of land i.e., Khasra No.1915/2 to respondent No. 2 – Directorate of Education and allow the use of said land for sport activities.

¶11

Learned counsel for the respondent No. 2, on instructions, states that a school building has already been constructed on Khasra No. 1915/2.

¶12

At this stage, learned counsel for the petitioners states that Khasra No.1890 adjacent to Khasra No.1915/2 is available for park/sports activities.

¶13

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 03/07/2025 at 20:12:08

¶14

Since the said relief has not been sought, the present petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to the petitioners to file a fresh representation with the respondent No.1. In the event, such a representation is filed within two weeks, the same is directed to be disposed of by way of speaking order within four weeks thereafter.

¶15

In the event, the petitioners are aggrieved by the decision disposing of their representation, they shall be at liberty to file appropriate proceedings in accordance with law.

¶16

ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE

¶17

TUSHAR RAO GEDELA, J

¶18

JULY 16, 2024/ p

¶19

Anjali through Father & Ors. v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

Anjali through Father & Ors. v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mukesh Kumar Vs Muncipal Corporation of Delhi

Mahesh Yadav Vs Union of India & Anr.

Mrs. Chinu Vs Union of India and Ors.

Swami Contractors Pvt. Ltd. Vs MCD and Anothers

Anand Pratap Singh Vs Union of India and Ors.

Pervez Hayaatt Vs Municipal Corporation of Delhi & Ors.

Mufg Bank Ltd. Vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax Circle 2 (2)(1) & Ors.

A.K. Malik Vs State Bank of India & Ors.

Abhijit Mishra Vs Government of NCT of Delhi and Ors.

Md. Sahil Vs Shyam Lal College Evening & Ors.

Abhay Kumar Singh Vs Municipal Corporation of Delhi

M/S Mnc Global and Anr. Vs Canara Bank Syndicate Bank

Arun Kumar Saini Vs Delhi Development Authority & Ors.

Usha Khanna and Anr. Vs Vinay Khanna