Petitioner received all due payments from Respondent No. 2 after filing the writ petition; relief became infructuous and the petition was dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~33
SOLITAIRE POWERTECH PRIVATE LIMITED .....Petitioner
Through: Mr. Deepak Thakur, Advocate
versus
UNION OF INDIA & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Aakanksha Bhola, Advocate for R-2. Ms. Sumana Naqanand, Mr. Tushar Kanti Mohindpoo, Mr. Arnav Khanna, Advocates for R-3.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULA
O R D E R
%
09.07.2024
SANJEEV NARULA, J
JULY 9, 2024/ab
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 03/07/2025 at 18:09:36
Solitaire Powertech Private Limited
Union of India
Sanjeev Narula
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
