Petitioner withdrew the writ petition. Respondent undertook to complete demolition on a specific date. Court recorded the undertaking and disposed of the petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~ A-23
FASAL .....Petitioner Through: Mr.Harshit Gupta, Advocate (through VC).
versus
MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI AND ORS.
.....Respondents Through: Ms.Richa Dhawan, Advocate with Mr.Anuj Chaturvedi, Standing Counsel for R-1. Mr.Santosh Kr.Tripathi, SC (Civil) with Mr.Kartik Sharma, Advocate for R-2.
Mr.Anees Ahmad, Advocate with MD Miskeen, Advocate for R-4.
CORAM: HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TUSHAR RAO GEDELA
%
O R D E R 08.07.2024
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 22/07/2024 at 12:33:25
ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE
TUSHAR RAO GEDELA, J
JULY 8, 2024/ TS
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 22/07/2024 at 12:33:25
Fasal
Municipal Corporation of Delhi
Tushar Rao Gedela
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
