The Delhi High Court disposed of the writ petition relying on the respondent's admission that it was not responsible for the impugned construction. The petitioner was granted liberty to implead the Revenue Authority.
Petition disposed; liberty granted to file appropriate petition impleading the Revenue Authority.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~73
GORDHAN DASS RATHEE STEELS LTD. .....Petitioner
Through: Ms. Apoorva Maheshwari with Mr.Kapil Wadhwa, Advocates.
versus
DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY .....Respondent Through: Ms. Manika Tripathy, Standing Counsel for DDA with Mr. Ashutosh Kaushik, Mr. Rony John and Mr. Vansh Kalra, Advocates.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAIN
O R D E R % 19.11.2024
W.P.(C) 4646/2024
1
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 21/11/2024 at 12:30:28
MANOJ JAIN, J
NOVEMBER 19, 2024 st
W.P.(C) 4646/2024
2
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 21/11/2024 at 12:30:28
GORDHAN DASS RATHEE STEELS LTD.
DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
Manoj Jain
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
