certified copies of audited financial statements and annual reports for three financial years – i.e., 2018-2021 as well as Income Tax Returns filed by the entity etc. As per the tender conditions, bidders who were successful at the Pre-Qualification Criteria were requested to make a presentation to the Respondent showcasing their capacity, capability and technical competence. Thereafter, the members of the Technical Evaluation Committee conducted physical verification of the site as well as the stated capacity and capability of the successful bidders. On the basis of such bid information/documents furnished by the bidders as well as the presentation and site visit of the Technical Evaluation Committee, marks are awarded to the bidders out of a total of 100 marks and only the bidders with minimum of 70 marks, are declared as Technical Qualified and considered for Commercial Evaluation. 3. The Petitioner participated in the aforementioned tender floated by the Respondent, however, vide communication dated 29th June, 2022, they were informed that their bid was technically disqualified as they failed to secure the minimum qualifying score of 70 marks out of 100. 4. At the outset, Mr. Narendra M. Sharma, counsel for Petitioners, states that the Petitioners do not intent to take any further legal action pertaining to the tender in question, however, he urges that through the instant writ petition the limited relief sought is for the disclosure of the marks awarded to the Petitioners, so that the Petitioners can make improvements in order to meet the eligibility requirements for future tenders.
