Contempt petition was not pressed; petitioner withdrew it to seek clarification from the Supreme Court. Court disposed of the petition with all rights and contentions of parties reserved.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~106
RAJIV AGGARWAL .....Petitioner
Through: Mr. Prithu Garg with Mr. Parth Bhatia and Mr. Shivam Singh, Advocates.
versus
SHRI DEBADATTA CHAND & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Arun Aggarwal with Mr. Shivam Saini and Mr. Praful Rawat, Advocate for respondent No.1. Ms. Radhika Bishwajit Dubey, CGSC for UOI with Ms. Gureen Kaur Waraich and Ms. Drishti Rawal, Advocates for respondent No.2.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAIN
O R D E R % 19.11.2024
MANOJ JAIN, J
NOVEMBER 19, 2024/st
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 21/11/2024 at 12:19:21
Rajiv Aggarwal
Shri Debadatta Chand
Respondent No. 2
Manoj Jain
As recorded by the court registry
Proceedings for wilful disobedience of a court order under the Contempt of Courts Act 1971.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
