The High Court of Delhi directed the respondent bank to decide the petitioner's proposal for extension of time to deposit the One Time Settlement amount within ten weeks and disposed of the writ petition.
Direction to decide proposal on extension of time expeditiously within ten weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~77
FRONTLINE RETAIL INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Vijay Kumar with Ms. Rekha Anand, Advocates.
versus
INDIAN OVERSEAS BANK ..... Respondent
Through: Mr. Pramod Kumar, Advocate.
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MINI PUSHKARNA
%
O R D E R 07.05.2024
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 09/05/2024 at 11:56:30
the petitioner is at liberty to seek his remedies in accordance with law, including revival of the present petition.
MINI PUSHKARNA, J
MAY 7, 2024
c
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 09/05/2024 at 11:56:30
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner's proposal for extension of time to deposit One Time Settlement amount should be decided expeditiously by the respondent bank.
Frontline Retail India Private Limited
Indian Overseas Bank
Mini Pushkarna
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
