The petitioner sought a restraint on the MCD from permitting commercial activities in a specific park. The respondent counsel stated steps had been taken, leading the petitioner to withdraw the petition, which is dismissed accordingly.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~46
QAYYUM KHAN ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Kartickay Mathur and Mr. Shankar, Advs.
versus
MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OFDELHI & ANR...... Respondents Through: Mr. Rajneesh Bhaskar and Mr. Rachit Raushan, Advs. for R-1 and 2.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN DATTA
O R D E R
% 07.05.2024
SACHIN DATTA, J
MAY 7, 2024/ cl
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 10/05/2024 at 11:55:35
QAYYUM KHAN
MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI
SACHIN DATTA
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
