Review petition seeking reconsideration of an earlier writ decision against IBBI. The court held the grounds merely reargued the matter or were never previously raised, found no error apparent on the face of the record, held the petition not maintainable, and dismissed it.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~56
VIVEK RAHEJA .....Petitioner
Through: Mr. Ashish Dholakia, Senior Advocate with Mr. Srikant Misra and Ms. Deeksha Khurana, Advocates.
versus
INSOLVENCY AND BANKRUPTCY BOARD OF INDIA.
.....Respondent Through: Mr. Sahil Monga and Ms. Alekhya Sattigeri, Advocates.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULA O R D E R % 07.10.2024
REVIEW PET. 370/2024
SANJEEV NARULA, J
OCTOBER 7, 2024
d.negi
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 09/10/2024 at 14:49:09
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the review petition raised any error apparent on the face of the record warranting interference.
Vivek Raheja
Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India
Sanjeev Narula
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
