Petitioner sought correction of a typographical error regarding a cited writ petition in a prior judgment. Court addressed the clerical error but dismissed other grounds as review petitions, holding no error existed on the face of the record.
The writ petition in paragraph no. 3 shall be read as W.P.(C) 549/2010; application otherwise dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~27
MRIDULA DEVI .....Petitioner
Through: Mr. I. C. Mishra and Dr. Balmiki Prasad, Advocates.
versus
UNION OF INDIA AND ORS .....Respondents Through: Ms. Thonpinao Thangal, Mr. Samir Ali Khan and Mr. Abhimanyu Jhamba, Advocates for R-4.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULA O R D E R % 22.11.2024
CM APPL. 67811/2024 (on behalf of Petitioner seeking modification of order/ judgment dated 06th August, 2024)
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 25/11/2024 at 14:35:06
assailing the order and not by seeking a modification.
SANJEEV NARULA, J
NOVEMBER 22, 2024 d.negi
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 25/11/2024 at 14:35:06
Mridula Devi
Union of India
Sanjeev Narula
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
