Writ petition challenging alleged unauthorized construction filed by a non-resident. Court held petition non-maintainable due to lack of locus standi and concealment of facts. No further orders required.
Writ petition disposed of; no further orders passed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~7
SUNIL SHARMA ..... Petitioner Through: Advocate (appearance not given).
versus
MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI & ANR. ... Respondents Through: Mr. Ajjay Aroraa, Mr. Kapil Dutta, Mr. Vansh Luthra and Mr. Simran Arora, Advs. for MCD. Mr.Ashish Dholakia, Sr. Adv. alongwith Mr. Mudit Gupta, Advs. for R2.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN DATTA O R D E R % 02.05.2024
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 06/05/2024 at 11:19:18
contended that the petition also suffers from concealment of facts.
SACHIN DATTA, J
MAY 2, 2024/at
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 06/05/2024 at 11:19:18
SUNIL SHARMA
MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI
SACHIN DATTA
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
