The writ petition regarding a executed tender was disposed of as infructuous because the tender had already been executed, making the challenge unnecessary.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~16
M/S PRAVARTEE SALES PRIVATE LIMITED ..... Petitioner
versus
STATION ADJUDANT & ORS. ..... Respondent
Through: Mr. Vineet Dhanda, CGSC for UOI
CORAM:
HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORA
O R D E R % 05.04.2024
ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE
MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORA, J
APRIL 5, 2024/ hp
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 09/04/2024 at 12:46:10
M/s PravarTEE Sales Private Limited
Station Adjudant
Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
